Before you do anything else, go and buy this piece of art HERE.
Postmortem artist, cartoonist and friend Zel Harris – known to you as Darkzel – was killed in 2013 robbing the comic, anthro, adult and RPG world of a very talented young artist whom I was proud to call my friend.
In his memory I insistuted the Darkzel Scholarship Scheme for young artists with an interest in Science Fiction and Fantasy.
Each year all profits from the sale of Zel’s art – and any scholarship winners or donated pieces – will be collected together and given to the best new, young artist (high school/college/university) that we can find to help them pay their way through their studies.
This year’s winner is Vera Nattler and this is her piece.
Hellix Clone Mercenary (Basic Model) 10xp
Close Defence: 12
Ranged Defence: 12
Hit Dice: 1+2 (6hp)
Saves: 5 (Toughness 8, Power 6, Logic 4, Will 4
Traits: Soldier, Fighter, Painless
Skills: Juggernaut 1
GeneriTech Carbine Blaster: D6 damage, Medium Range, Ammo Save 16
GeneriTech Light Body Armour: d3 protection
200gp per soldier
Hellix manufacture human – and other clones – for use in warzones in large numbers. They have a lifespan from activation of six months, are infertile and are bonded to follow the orders of the first person they see and anyone that person designates. They come packaged in a suspension pod of simple and fragile design with a ‘pull tab to open’ activation cycle.
Ammender Monks of the Church of the Duo 250xp
Close Defence: 12
Ranged Defence: 18
Hit Dice: 1 (5hp)
Attacks: 1/+5 (+8 ranged).
Skills: Combat Reflexes x4
Traits: Adaptable x3
Ammender Vestments: 1d4 Armour, Gunner +3, Life Support +3 1100gp
Kult Ammender: Pistol, d20 damage, Medium Range, Ammo Save 14, Targeter +3, Vicious x3, Extra Capacity x6, 2050gp
Heavy Deflector Shield
The Church of the Duo and its monks, the Ammenders, are deadly, renown gunighters though they maintain a policy of indirect intervention only. They supply arms to anyone and everyone who is disarmed or whose government denies them access to weapons. If attacked or caught in a battle they will fight to the end, but they believe in defence of the self rather than anything else. They will also fight to recover their armour or weapons if lost, stolen or sold and to destroy anyone who would attempt to disarm them.
Much fun has been had at the expense of some people choosing not to support Contessa, which is allegedly having problems filling its games, panels and so on this year (though the organiser has said this is not the case).
Online conventions face a lot of problems. People view the commitment to any kind of online gaming scenario with less seriousness than they do a physical meet up.
Technical issues, despite ubiquitous internet, webcam and microphone access, can throw everything off in an instant.
People drop in and out constantly.
Everything runs more slowly.
Contessa has some additional problems over and above other online cons in addition to this.
Games are played and recorded over hangouts and posted to Youtube.
The organisational and game-running parts of the event are explicitly exclusionary. Men are not permitted.
The video thing tweaks a lot of people’s sense of security and safety, inhibits RP (much as playing at cons can, but tenfold) and makes people very self conscious, especially of their appearance. I find it likely that SomethingAwful, YourDungeonIsSuck and others will succumb to the temptation of ‘video mining’ as they have forum mining, in an attempt to bully and ridicule people.
The second part here is what has put me off and has meant I won’t support the con. When the event was conceived this was my objection and it remains my objection. I would not tolerate or support an event where women, people of colour, LGBT or others were specifically excluded and so just as I cannot tolerate prejudice against those groups – in any form – nor can I tolerate prejudice against men.
You’re free to disagree, but my conscience and principles will not allow me to do so. I will not try to stop you attending, I will not try to ban or silence the event. I think Stacey (the organiser) is a great person and not your typical Social Justice Warrior type and I don’t think she did this with any malice. It’s just not something I will support. There’s no reason men’s expertise and opinions should be absent from a con about women in gaming any more than women’s voices should be absent in any other con. There’s no reason men can’t offer their perspectives on women’s contributions and no reason men can’t run games by women or for women.
If you want to attend, go right ahead, I won’t be.
That’s it! Quite why it’s such a horrible position to hold or so hard to grasp, I don’t know.